Connect with us

Defective Products

Owners of 2018 BMWs Need to Visit Their Dealers

mm

Published

on

A major recall is impacting most owners of 2018 and newer BMW models along with some Rolls-Royce models and the Toyota Supra. The recall notice involves the backup camera and issues with the image not being visible.

Major Recall for Defective Backup Cameras

BMW issued a recall for most models 2018 and newer. The Rolls-Royce Phantom and Cullinan are also part of the recall, along with the Supra from Toyota. The problem is that the backup camera can be adjusted to the point where you can no longer see the image in the display. The contrast and brightness levels can be changed in these models.

The driver can go to settings and make adjustments to the brightness and contrast levels. They may not realize that the changes mean they can’t see any images clearly from the camera display. The settings remain in place even after the vehicle is shut off and restarted. The result is the images aren’t clear the next time the driver gets in the car and starts to back up. This is the same issue that caused Nissan to recall more than one million models. A total of 51 models are affected by the recall.

BMW will begin sending out letters to owners of the models on November 19. The issue isn’t difficult to fix. You just take the vehicle to a dealership and new software will be installed that will take care of the problem. All the work will be done at no cost to the owner.

Risks of Injury with a Minor Accident

While this may seem like a minor issue, it could have significant impact to anyone in the vehicle. Drivers who rely on the backup camera to help them when they are reversing won’t have the assistance. It could lead to them backing into another vehicle or various obstacles. Most of the time, these accidents would be at slow speeds, so many people would think it’s no big deal. However, an accident even at a slow speed could cause injury.

Studies have shown that significant injury can occur even at speeds as low as 5 MPH. About 85 percent of all neck injuries occur from rear-end impact. In fact, the researchers state that the majority of neck injuries happen at slower speeds. The soft tissue around the neck can be stretched, resulting in whiplash. While this condition is often thought of as not serious, it can be quite painful and last for several weeks or even years. Whiplash is common, but it should not be trivialized because it can have long-term consequences.

It is important to not equate vehicle damage with severity of injury. Many vehicles are made to withstand low-speed impact, but those same features can increase the risk of injury in the occupants. While a vehicle may show no damage at all, the person inside may suffer from whiplash or neck strains or sprains. That is why it’s important to seek medical treatment even in a minor accident. You never know when you might have an injury even if you don’t notice any issues at the time.

Comments
Continue Reading

Defective Products

eBay to Remove Reclined Sleepers from Website

mm

Published

on

Consumer Reports asks retailers to stop selling inclined sleepers, citing them as dangerous for infants. This request is for online marketplaces as well, and eBay is complying.

eBay will be banning all inclined infant sleepers from the website, not just those that have recall notices attached to them. This action is in response to a letter sent from Consumer Reports to 15 businesses in the retail industry, including eBay.

Dangerous for Babies

Inclined sleepers for infants angle babies between 10 and 30 degrees, which can be dangerous for them when they fall asleep. Consumer Reports has deemed the entire category or infant reclined sleepers as unsafe because of the overall design. Products in this category have been linked to 73 infant fatalities.

These products are dangerous because they put the babies at an incline for sleeping. The infant’s head can lean forward, putting their chin down on their chest, which can compress the airway and allow them to suffocate. Other issues with these products include soft bedding and having a rounded surface which isn’t in following of the recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

eBay has already started enforcing the restrictions and banning products, such as the Hiccapop DayDreamer and Evenflo Pillo Portable Napper. The Fisher-Price Rock ‘n Play Sleeper is one of the best known and was recalled earlier in the year. In fact, over five million products in this category have been recalled. Several brands are still available to purchase even though experts have warned against using them.

Multiple organizations have advised parents, daycare centers and others not to use any infant inclined sleeper, including the AAP and Consumer Federation of America.

The companies contacted in the letter include:

  • Amazon
  • Bed Bath and Beyond
  • Albee Baby
  • Craigslist
  • Buy Buy Baby
  • Facebook
  • Macy’s
  • Kohl’s
  • Target
  • Walmart
  • Magic Beans
  • You Are My Everything

Both eBay and You Are My Everything have agreed to remove the products from sale. Other companies have not replied to the letter. One of the concerns with these products is they are marketed as safe for resting or napping, but it only takes a few minutes for a baby to suffocate when they fall asleep. Experts say it’s wrong to promote them as safe for any amount of sleep. Babies have suffocated in infant reclined sleepers in less than 15 minutes, according to incident reports.

Along with the risk of suffocation, another danger is with the baby being able to roll over. They roll from their back to their stomach if they are left unrestrained, which is another position which increases the risk of suffocation. They may turn into the side of the device and smother.

The AAP recommends putting babies to bed on a firm mattress with no other bedding. They should be placed on their backs with nothing else in the bed. This is the only position which is approved by the AAP and for doctors until the baby is able to turn over by themselves.

Comments
Continue Reading

Defective Products

New Tests for Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Show No Asbestos

Published

on

According to Johnson & Johnson, new tests on Johnson’s Baby Powder show that the product is free of asbestos. Trace amounts had been found previously, as reported by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Testing for Asbestos

A test conducted by the FDA earlier had shown indications of asbestos being present in the powder. In response, the manufacturer recalled a single lot of the baby powder back in October. Since then, Johnson & Johnson has conducted 155 tests using two third-party labs and four testing methods. The samples were from the same bottle used in the FDA tests.

The manufacturer had already responded to the FDA findings by conducting a small test in October which showed no asbestos findings. However, the DFA stood by its results. Officials did say that the difference in tests could be the result of contaminants not being uniform in the product. They also admitted there is no standardized testing to detect asbestos in talc.

The tests that were done by the third-party labs showed no asbestos in the bottle or in any samples of the rest of the lot from which the bottle came. The manufacturer suggested that the FDA results were from contamination or a lab error.

About 33,000 bottles of the product were recalled in the US in October after the FDA results were noted. This was a voluntary recall by Johnson & Johnson and the first time for such a recall. However, it’s not the first time the company has faced accusations that the products cause health issues, including cancer.

Mesothelioma

Asbestos is a known carcinogen, which means it’s likely to cause cancer. In this case, it is mesothelioma, which is a deadly type of cancer that acts fast and is aggressive.

Mesothelioma results from the asbestos fibers getting into the lungs. Over time, continued exposure to asbestos causes the fibers to build up in the lungs. Mesothelioma is a cancer of the lining around the lungs or abdomen as well as other organs.

This is a rare type of cancer that has fewer than 20,000 new cases diagnosed each year. Treatments are available, but they only manage the condition rather than curing it. A person can live for several years with mesothelioma while some have had much longer lifespans after the diagnosis.

Common symptoms of mesothelioma include coughing and pain in the chest. The person may be short of breath and often loses weight. Several options for treatment exist, but the cancer metastasizes quickly. Chemotherapy may be an option as well as radiation. Surgery and other medical procedures may be recommended, but they only help with the condition rather than removing the cancer.

When mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos, it happens over a longer period. Products that contain the material can release it into the environment where the person will inhale it. Slowly, enough of the asbestos will accumulate in the lungs to cause a problem. Because of it being a carcinogen, asbestos is banned from products in the US.

Comments
Continue Reading

Defective Products

Vapers May Pay Higher Life Insurance Premiums

mm

Published

on

Reinsurers around the world are reevaluating insurance premiums and risk for those who vape. Vapers may end up paying more for insurance than smokers or even be excluded completely from some policies.

Current totals for vaping deaths stand at 47 for one mysterious lung illness that has been connected to vaping. Other health concerns have continued to grow even though some studies show that vaporizers and e-cigarettes help smokers to stop using traditional cigarettes.

Warnings to Insurers

Reinsurers are the companies that insure the insurance providers. They use their vast research tools to help insurers determine risk. While they don’t provide recommendations for pricing or require specific policies, they do give general advice on risk. They can also charge higher premiums or even fail to provide reinsurance if their advice isn’t followed.

In the past, vapers were treated like smokers when it came to insurance. Smokers already pay up to twice as much as nonsmokers for life insurance because of the higher risk for lung cancer and other health problems. Three reinsurers have updated their recommendations on vaping recently with others still considering their guidelines.

The warnings from the reinsurers includes vaping products that contain THC, which is an active ingredient in marijuana. They also focus on younger vapers, particularly insuring those who are under the age of 25 due to the recent illnesses and deaths from the vaping illness. Many of those who have had the illness have been under that age and even still in their teens.

Many insurers are treating vapers the same as smokers while refusing to insure those who are vaping products which may be likely to cause cancer. Supporters of vaping believe this step is harsh because it’s already difficult for people who smoke to get insurance.

Most insurers have already put vapers with smokers when it comes to pricing and risk. The few that didn’t in the past are beginning to change their stance now. Reinsurers are continuing to monitor the information available about vaping and health concerns.

Damage from Vaping

It’s still too early to tell the long-term damage from vaping. If more illnesses from vaping become apparent, it is expected that insurers will respond accordingly. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended that people stop vaping, especially with products that contain THC or vitamin E. Experts suggest that people give up vaping completely until it’s determined what ingredient is causing the epidemic that overtook the nation during the summer.

This is another hit for vaping manufacturers who have already lost customers and support due to the negative publicity and information being presented. They continue to claim that vaping is safer than smoking, but recent deaths have placed a high concern about this idea out to the public. In fact, JUUL was one manufacturer that the FDA gave a warning to for promoting their products as a safer alternative. That claim cannot be made unless specific data is provided to support it, which JUUL did not have. The manufacturer has stopped all marketing in the US but still continues to promote products in other countries.

Comments
Continue Reading

Trending