Connect with us

Defective Products

Artificial Sweeteners May Not Be As Beneficial As Expected

mm

Published

on

If you are trying to lose weight or are watching your sugar intake because of diabetes, you may be very interested in the latest study on artificial sweeteners and whether they are beneficial or harmful.

Sugar vs. Sugar Substitutes

Sugar has been deemed a toxin by researchers and doctors alike who say it can disrupt the normal hormonal cycles of the body and harm internal organs. Excessive consumption is one of the primary causes of metabolic disorders and obesity.

To combat the alleged ill-effects of sugar, the industry created, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a list of high-intensity artificial sweeteners that have few to no calories, such as:

  • Saccharin – sold under the brand names– Sweet and Low, Sweet’N Low, Sweet Twin, and Necta Sweet
  • Aspartame – sold under the brand names Nutrasweet, Equal, Sugar Twin
  • Acesulfame potassium – sold under the brand names Sunett, Sweet One, and listed in ingredients as Ace-K, acesulfame K
  • Sucralose – sold under the brand name Splenda
  • Neotame – sold under the brand name Newtame
  • Advantame – used in food as flavor enhancer and sweetener
  • Steviol glycosides – sold under the brand name Stevia

After so many artificial sweeteners hit the market, researchers determined they might not be all that good for you. In fact, some studies have concluded that artificial sweeteners can increase obesity, metabolic disorders, diabetes, and even cancer.

To get a better understanding of the risks and benefits of artificial sweeteners, a group of researchers assessed and analyzed 56 existing studies involving child and adult participants and compared those with low/no intake of sugar substitutes against those who consume more. The study authors looked at body mass index, weight, behavior, mood, blood sugar levels, oral health, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and cancer.

Study Results Surprising

After analyzing the studies, researchers report they found no real difference in the health outcomes of those who used artificial sweeteners and those who didn’t. Study authors said that no ‘statistically or clinically relevant’ outcome was determined between those who used artificial sweeteners and those that didn’t, no matter their level of intake.

Some previous smaller studies have found weak and non-compelling evidence that artificial sweeteners could help reduce blood sugar levels and body mass index. Researchers have also reported some small weight loss in people who consumed small amounts of artificial sweeteners, but the evidence was also non-compelling. And these same results were seen in child participants where sugar substitutes could slightly reduce weight gain but had no effect on body mass index.

The study reported that there was no good evidence of any benefits of artificial sweeteners, noted that potential harms from the use of artificial sweeteners could not be ruled out. Study authors noted that more substantial studies were needed to determine the effects of sugar substitutes on obesity, weight, diabetes risks, and kidney disease.

But sugar substitutes are increasing in popularity and have been for quite some time. So, understanding the risks and benefits of these products is extremely important for consumers, especially diabetes patients who routinely use these products daily.

Comments
Continue Reading

Defective Products

Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Surge as Health Risks Linked to “Forever Chemicals”

mm

Published

on

Toxic Firefighting Foam at the Center of Growing Legal Battle

Thousands of individuals across the U.S. are pursuing legal action after being diagnosed with cancer and other serious illnesses allegedly caused by exposure to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF)—a fire suppressant widely used by the military, firefighters, and airport personnel.

PFAS: The “Forever Chemicals” Linked to Cancer

AFFF contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), toxic compounds that persist in the human body and environment. These “forever chemicals” have been linked in scientific studies to a range of health problems, including kidney, testicular, liver, and thyroid cancers, as well as thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis.

Nearly 9,000 Lawsuits Consolidated in Federal Court

The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL), currently underway in federal court, has consolidated close to 9,000 individual claims. Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to disclose the health risks associated with PFAS despite internal evidence of harm.

Corporate Misconduct Under Scrutiny

Recently unsealed documents suggest that companies like 3M were aware of PFAS toxicity but marketed their products as safe and environmentally friendly. The revelations have intensified public scrutiny and fueled demands for accountability.

Major Settlements Signal Legal Momentum

Several large settlements have already been reached. Carrier Global Corp agreed to a $615 million payout to resolve water contamination claims tied to PFAS exposure. The volume of new cases continues to rise, with nearly 500 added to the MDL in March 2025 alone.

Key Trials and Scientific Review Ahead

The court has scheduled a series of bellwether trials to help determine the strength of the scientific and legal arguments on both sides. A “Science Day” on June 20, 2025, will focus specifically on the link between PFAS and cancers such as thyroid and liver cancer.

Who May Be Affected

Individuals at highest risk include firefighters, military service members, airport personnel, and residents living near military installations where AFFF was routinely used. Those exposed through contaminated drinking water or occupational settings who later developed qualifying illnesses may be eligible for compensation.

Next Steps for Potential Claimants

Legal experts note that many firms are offering free case evaluations and require no upfront costs to file a claim. As litigation intensifies, advocates urge anyone affected by PFAS exposure to seek legal guidance and explore their options for recovery.

Those looking to inquire about a potential compensation claim can visit https://www.afffexposure.com/.

Comments
Continue Reading

Defective Products

Sunbeam Crockpots Recalled for Burn Injuries

mm

Published

on

Sunbeam Products has issued a recall of one of its crock pot products due to a burn hazard. The recall came just two days before the Thanksgiving holiday, during a time when crock pots are often in use.

Details of the Crock Pot Recall

The product involved in the recall is the Crock-Pot 6-Quart Express Multi-Cooker. Almost one million of these defective products have been sold. According to the recall, the multi-cooker may pressurize if the lid hasn’t been locked in place completely. The pressure can make the lid to detach when the crock pot is in use. If the hot food or liquid ejects from the pot, it can lead to serious burns.

The recall impacts mostly purchases in the US with almost 29,000 in Canada. The cookers were bought at Walmart, Target and online at Amazon as well as other national retailers. The timeline was from July 2017 and up to the time of the recall. The crock put costs between $70 and $100. To find out if your crock pot is part of the recall, you can look at the bottom of the base or on the electrical plug on one of the prongs for the codes K196JN through K365JN and L001JN through L273JN.

It’s advised that anyone with this product not use it as a pressure cooker, but it can be used for sauted and slow cooking recipes. The company will send lids to consumers for free to replace the defective ones if they contact the manufacturer.

The recall notice advised that if consumers use the product as a pressure cooker, they should make sure the lid is in the fully locked position. They can tell if it is secured by making sure the arrow on the lid is aligned with the lock on the base.

Burn Injuries and the Serious Consequences

Sunbeam has gotten more than 100 reports where the lid detached in use. This resulted in almost 100 burn injuries. These burns range from first-degree to third-degree.

A first-degree burn is considered superficial because it only impacts the first layer of skin. This type of injury may not require medical care, but it can be quite painful. However, some cases may require a visit to the doctor or hospital if it covers a large area or hurts too much. Third-degree burns are much more serious and require immediate medical care because the burn impacts the other layers of skin. Infection is often a major concern with third-degree burns as well as other complications.

A person with a third-degree burn may feel a great deal of pain, but it can also be numb. There is often scarring from this type of burn. However, any burn can be considered serious if not taken care of properly.

While many products are recalled and often ignored, this recall from Sunbeam is considered serious and should not be taken lightly. Anyone with one of these products is at risk for serious and permanent injury.

Comments
Continue Reading

Defective Products

Ceiling Fans Being Recalled for Flying Blades Safety Risk

mm

Published

on

Nearly 200,000 ceiling fans have been recalled after reports were made that the blades of the fans came off while in use. Injuries and property damage were reported from some of the incidents.

Faulty Ceiling Fans and the Dangers They Present

Hampton Bay Mara ceiling fans were for both indoor and outdoor use. They were sold at Home Depot in store and online. These products were sold during April and October of 2020. The fans come in black, matte black, matte white, and polished nickel. They feature a remote control and a color-changing LED light.

Of the almost 200,000 products, almost all were sold in the US. Nearly 9000 were sold in Canada. Anyone who has purchased one of these fans should stop using them and check that the blades are secure. Consumers should look for movement in the blades when the fan is shut off. They should also inspect for gaps between the blades that are uneven and movement of the body or clip.

If anyone notices a problem with their ceiling fan, they are to contact King of Fans for a free replacement. The company that makes the fans has promised to replace any problem products for free. There have already been 47 reports where the blades detached from the body while in motion. Two of those reports showed the blades hitting someone with four reports showing property damage. The defect comes from the fan flywheel and the locking clip for the blade, which allows the blade to become detached.

Ceiling Fan Installation Dangers and Risks

Ceiling fans can be dangerous even without a defective product. If you DIY an installation and it isn’t done properly, you could end up with disastrous results. Because the fan is heavy, if it’s not attached correctly, it can come crashing down. Added to the weight of the fan is the rotational pull when it’s turned on. It’s critical to know how to install a fan properly to prevent injury.

Electrical issues can also cause damage and injury if the circuits are overloaded. This is more likely to be an issue in an older home, which may not be equipped to handle the increased electrical load. A fire can start in a bedroom where a ceiling fan is located. By the time you are aware of it, the fire may have spread out of control.

If the ceiling fan blades detach, they can hit someone in the head or elsewhere on the body. Since the fan is in use, the extra power from the blades turning can give them a stronger impact when they hit an obstacle. You could end up with a concussion or even a fracture or broken bone from one of these blades. If you have a faulty ceiling fan and need it replaced, don’t continue using the fan until a new one is installed. Consider hiring a professional and get a new fan to prevent injury to you or your family.

Comments
Continue Reading

Trending