A government panel from the US Food and Drug Administration now says that higher asbestos testing standards is necessary. These standards would be above what has been in place currently.
A New Report
One of the most important recommendations is that all mineral products that are found in beauty and health products should be considered as possibly harmful even if they haven’t been classified as asbestos. These minerals could still be breathed in and end up in the lungs.
According to experts, these minerals can cause the same outcomes to the system as asbestos. It doesn’t matter how they are categorized. The panel also supports the stance of the World Health Organization that no exposure to asbestos is safe. They advocated for the most sensitive testing methods for cosmetics and talc powders.
The recommendations the panel gave are markedly different from what other advisors have suggested. As recent as 2018, many experts in a meeting sponsored by the FDA played down any possible hazards from asbestos in talc or similar minerals. Scientists and other experts criticized the reports that came from the meeting.
According to the FDA, the panel didn’t work with or get recommendations from manufacturers in the cosmetic industry or other groups. A spokesman for Johnson & Johnson said they would be glad to review the information for the best way to test for the presence of asbestos and other minerals in talc.
Danger in Beauty Products?
Asbestos had been found in Johnson & Johnson baby powder back in October 2019. Around 33,000 bottles were recalled. It was the first time in the history of the company that such a recall had occurred. The manufacturer hired an independent lab to test the product and no asbestos was reported to be found. According to Johnson & Johnson, 155 tests were conducted with state of the art methods and no asbestos were found.
Currently, no testing of talc products is required even though talc and asbestos are often found in the same place in the ground. Instead, regulators allowed companies to develop their own safety regulations.
Nothing has changed officially with the report, but the FDA will use it to decide if standardized testing methods are necessary. However, they haven’t announced a deadline for the review. Experts do say the recommendations themselves could be used in court cases and to influence other scientific practices.
Asbestos and similar minerals are possible carcinogens, which can cause cancer with prolonged exposure. These tiny particles get breathed in and trapped inside the lungs where they can’t escape. Over time, they can scar the lungs and lead to permanent damage, even death.
The significance of the information from the panel may not be fully known until after the FDA has had time to review, but it does lead the way to long-term changes by cosmetics companies that have failed to address the issue in the past. At the very least, it will encourage them to take more responsibility for providing safe products.